PR Niblets

Monday, November 11, 2019

Workplace Gender Equality Has Come A Long Way, But Still Has Work to Do

by Elana Spivack, Assistant Account Executive

What does a story about a woman in Harvard’s physics department have to do with public relations?

A lot, it turns out.

Right now, more women can work – and are working – than ever before. Public relations happens to be a women-dominated field, one in which women occupy positions at all levels and run entire agencies. However, an estimated 80% of C-level executives in the industry are men. Many people who work in PR are women, but most leaders are men, meaning women perform a great deal of work and might go unrecognized.

Here’s where that story comes in. In 1962, Miriam Rykles was hired to work in Harvard’s physics department as an administrative assistant. But, the duties she performed far exceeded her job description, and she often did her male bosses’ work.

While there are far more women in the work place than there were in 1962, and they possess far more power, gender inequality remains an issue. Much like how Miriam and her fellow assistants did hard work without thanks in a man’s world, women outnumber men but more men still sit at the top.

[This story was originally published on the Jewish Women’s Archive Blog on October 17, 2019]

Miriam Rykles at the Harvard lab, 1967.
Photo courtesy Miriam Rykles.
“I’ll be frank with you: Harvard is a man’s institution. Women don’t get anywhere. But, [they] run the university.” 

This was the answer Miriam Rykles, now 94, received when she applied to work in Harvard University’s physics department in 1962. In the more than 30 years that followed, Rykles would work with Nobel Prize-winning physicists, help manage the lab’s Cambridge Electron Accelerator, and witness one of the first US-Russia relationships during the Cold War, all under the modest title of Administrative Assistant.

This story may sound familiar because it’s also the story of many other women who sought careers in the mid-twentieth century and were met with skepticism. While working conditions for women in America have improved significantly, it’s crucial to acknowledge that for decades, women have been performing the grunt work—and more—to help run institutions like Harvard.

Rykles doesn’t have more than a high school background in physics. In fact, her story begins a long way from Harvard. Originally from Wilno, Poland (present day Vilnius, Lithuania), Rykles was only sixteen when she was forced into the city’s ghetto in 1941. After the ghetto’s liquidation two years later, Rykles was sent to labor camps until Europe’s liberation in 1945 after the Nazis surrendered. This story, unfortunately, also resonates with many people. 

After the war, she made her way to Warsaw. Competent in Yiddish, Polish, English, German, and Russian, she found work there as a translator. That same year, a French cousin persuaded her to move to Paris. In the early 1950s, more relatives found Rykles through the Red Cross and invited her to live with them in America. In October 1952, at age 27, Rykles arrived in Massachusetts. She initially found work with an insurance company, but found it dull. Unwilling to settle for any old American job, she went to Harvard in search of more interesting work.

“At that time, women were looking for something interesting to do,” Rykles says. “For a woman to apply for an office job, it meant being a clerical worker, a secretary. You were answering the phone, typing, taking shorthand.” However, the duties a secretary performed often went beyond this job description. Rykles and her female colleagues were on the lowest rung, but performed work at levels comparable to their male superiors.

“I spent time talking to the other secretaries who were taking dictation, answering the phone, but at the same time, they were answering very important questions for their bosses,” Rykles says. She describes the “impossible task” of trying to show the other women that they were as capable and intelligent as the other men in the office. “I would talk to a secretary who was running the office and really answering questions of policy and all kinds of things. I would sit there and watch her work and catch her each time she’d say something about policy. I’d say, ‘Look, Carol, this is not secretarial work. This is your boss’s work. You just told him the policy.’ And she just couldn’t get it.”

Miriam Rykles, front and seated, in her office, 1968.
Photo courtesy Miriam Rykles.

Rykles describes women at Harvard as “shadows”—they were nearly invisible, but moved in lockstep with their male bosses, sometimes doing their work for them. Her boss, leading high-energy physicist Karl Strauch, noticed her curiosity and nurtured it. He trusted her with more responsibilities. In addition to teaching two classes at Harvard, Strauch was involved in cultivating America’s scientific relationship with Europe. 

“He had an office in Switzerland where he had an experiment going,” Rykles says. “There was always a relationship between CERN (European Council for Nuclear Research) and Harvard…He had certain committees on that.” Some of Rykles’s work included preparing materials and changing contracts for such committees.

As Strauch was so involved with CERN, he was close to physicists from the USSR. Consequently, Rykles had access to all phases of the fledgling relationship between the US and the USSR, held together by the tenuous connection of physics. According to a 1990 paper by Roy Rubinstein, former director of particle physics and accelerator laboratory Fermilab, the two nations began collaborating on high-energy physics in 1966. Rykles helped to organize the 6th International High-Energy Accelerators Conference in Cambridge in 1967. She had access to one of the first amicable connections between these sparring nations.

Rykles’s language skills, which initially won her a translation job in Warsaw after the war, proved critical at Harvard. She used Russian for translating letters between the department director and Soviet physicists. Eventually, in the 80s, a personal telegraph was installed in her office so she could communicate directly with the Russian Academy of Sciences. Her Russian was so good that when one of the department’s physicists began learning the language, she jokingly told him, “You will never catch up with me!”

Although Rykles and the other women working in the physics department were performing duties outside their job descriptions, they didn’t receive commensurate compensation. So, why did she stay?

“I liked the work,” she says. “I had access to everything.” Between her curiosity and Strauch’s support, she had the freedom to do what she wanted. She realized just how much power she wielded, all things considered, and how much knowledge her curiosity afforded her. “I...learned things that no women would probably dare learn; women were really supposed to ‘not know’ and so they didn’t.” 

Rykles’s influence was subtle but effective. Her efforts may have gone undetected, but they were of consequence. Her curiosity compelled her to pore over the documents in her possession, and often keep things because she found them interesting. At one point, this tendency led her to make a crucial discovery.

“Experimental physicists are known for not keeping their papers. When it’s done and served the purpose, they throw the papers out,” Rykles says. “I did not.” She describes one experiment done at Cornell University that included participants from Harvard. One of the participating scientists wrote a “tongue-in-cheek” paper on the experiment, ridiculing its proposal. “I read it and it was fascinating,” Rykles says. Even though she was instructed to throw out these papers, she kept them because they were “too interesting to throw out.”

Twenty-five years later, Rykles learned that Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sheldon Glashow was trying to commercially develop a particular experiment. He found investors and was going full force. Rykles got ahold of his project description and noticed it looked familiar. She went to her files and found that wry paper from years ago, and realized it was the same experiment that Glashow was developing. “Officially, he would have to invite the former director of that project into his cooperation,” Rykles says. After Rykles made this catch, Glashow appointed the former director of the experiment as a corporate member. However, the one who originally wrote that wry paper “knew all along that it wouldn’t work.” And it didn’t.

Rykles worked as an administrative assistant for 30 years, and continued working freelance after her retirement in 1991 to assist Strauch, who had Parkinson’s. While her path is unique, her story as a curious, tenacious woman at Harvard is part of a larger, shared history of accomplished but unrecognized women. There are certainly many others like Rykles: women and other marginalized people who worked (and still work) as administrative assistants, but performed higher level jobs without recognition. Men’s successes are built on the backs of these people, and while, yes, men did make strides in research, physics, and beyond, they didn’t complete this work unaided. One doesn’t have to look too closely to see an army of women pushing progress forward.

Monday, April 8, 2019

How to Make It in America by Patryk Slodzinski, NBS Communications

Patryk, an account executive at NBS Communications, in Warsaw, Poland, and a member of the first class of the participants in the PRWA Exchange programme, shares his thoughts on the programme and the time he spent at Feintuch Communications in New York City and Stanton Communications in Washington D.C. at the beginning of this year.

When I first learned about the PR World Alliance’s exchange programme I was instantly sold on the idea. Despite a pretty fair deal of time spent living abroad, I had pretty limited experience of exchanges, Erasmus student exchange being the most notable I ever participated probably, but I’ve always found such opportunities alluring.

At NBS, I am usually involved in projects with a strong Public Affairs component, and although I am very much engaged in those issues and find that part of the job really interesting, I was curious about broader PR practices. NBS is pretty open organization and I am often asking around to learn more about what else we are doing, however our strong IR pedigree makes it a specific place, not an archetype of the industry at large. I realized that the exchange could serve as a good occasion to look beyond all that limitations.

I submitted the eleventh-hour application and the next thing I knew I was crossing the Atlantic. I’ve picked the United States as I imagined that there couldn’t be a public relations market, in the PRWA network, more different to Polish one than the American. The public relations industry did not develop in Poland until the early nineties, with NBS dating back to 1990 considered as one of the founding fathers of the industry, whereas modern PR in the US has been present since the beginning of the century.

As for many before me, my first step on the American soil was New York City, where Henry Feintuch hosted me for a week at Feintuch Communications. Henry set me up at hip place at heart of Williamsburg so every day I had a proper NY millennial experience with a morning commute to Manhattan and constant nagging at the L-train delays, topped with a great deal of after-hours fun in ever-changing Brooklyn.

Work-wise, I’ve came just after the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, an important event for technology-oriented Feintuch Communications. The aftermath turned out to be “an extremely quiet period”, per Henry’s estimation. However, that allowed me to have more time to talk and discuss with Henry and his team. We often exchanged information and opinions on how both our firms worked, identifying the areas of similarity and comparing differences between the market realities in Poland and the U.S.

The other advantage of that relative lack of pressure, was that it made room for more casual socializing with Henry and his staff and made a great combination with Henry’s hospitable attitude. Henry was an amazing host that eagerly carved some of his after-hours time to hang around Brooklyn, get an after-hours drink or see a Broadway show.

In terms of the programme’s objectives I’ve been regularly invited to client meetings and internal brain storming sessions, where I could contribute as well. Even if I didn’t know the client, or the industry that well it was genuinely interesting and informative as Henry and his staff were really forthcoming and frank in those exchanges. On my own I was able to do stuff I mostly don’t do at home which was really refreshing such as pitching journalist for the upcoming trade show in Amsterdam.

The next stop was D.C. where I’ve spent another week with Peter Stanton and his team. The general framework was kind of similar. I could get involved in practically anything that was in the pipeline, with my engagement ranging, from just observing, a kind of fly on the wall arrangement to full participation, according to my preference. 

Coming to Washington I had also bit of a different goal in mind, as I’ve imagined that D.C. could be a great place to observe some of the best practices from my particular turf – Public Affairs. And even if Stanton Communications did not have any on-going project in this field my conversations with Peter allowed me to get a fair deal of quality insight.

During my time across the pond, both Peter, Henry and their respective teams have been equally open, candid and willing to share their know-how and opinions with me while I was involved in many projects at various stages. Thanks to that sensibly loose structure I was able to have a broad perspective and see many aspects of the PR profession I am not exposed in my daily routine. On the other hand, the workload made it possible to stay in the loop with the developments back at NBS, and whenever I felt I need it catch up with some assignments there I was free to do so.

I highly recommend participating in the programme, I came back with a different, wider perspective and many fresh ideas I hope to implement at home.

Monday, September 24, 2018

PR Worldwide: Employee Advocacy as a Strong Link in Your PR strategy

Anyone who wants to implement a PR campaign internationally is faced with various challenges. The language and cultural barriers and other working methods do not often simplify things. Yet as a company you want to have one voice to be heard and achieve the best results in every country with a universal strategy. How can you handle this?

With this question in mind, the PR World Alliance (PRWA) – Feintuch Communications is a founding member – recently visited the Netherlands at the invitation of Marcommit, our local market partner. Ten offices from different countries came together in Amsterdam to discuss international PR issues. Fake news and employee advocacy popped up as the two main themes.

In this first part of this two-part blog series we will dive deeper into employee advocacy and the role that PR can have in this. What do our eastern neighbors say about the use of social media among employees? How do French organizations successfully attract candidates and what core values ​​are relevant in American labor market communications? You read it in la première partie of this international series!

A stage for your own employees
The Netherlands is currently dealing with an employee shortage. This means that employee advocacy is in vogue. We can see the examples all around us. For example, think about police vlogger Jan-Willem and the Dutch online police series RobuustBlauw. Both vlogs attract many youngsters (and therefore potential employees) and give them a glimpse behind the scenes of the Dutch police world. It is not surprising that more and more companies are committed to the ambassadorship of their employees. For example, research from LinkedIn shows that companies with involved employees have a 58-percent greater chance to attract top talent.

Eline Visser is managing director at Marcommit and observes that an increasing number of companies are using creative ways to reach out to potential employees.

"By activating employees to share relevant content in which the organizational culture emerges, an effective form of word-of-mouth advertising is deployed. After all, it is much stronger and much more credible to let your own employees tell others that you are a good employer, than that you do that as a company. This makes employee advocacy a truly strategic marketing tool: it can achieve a high organic reach and appeal to a wider audience. However, it is important that you start from the right objective and adjust your approach accordingly. Do you want more reactions to vacancies? Or strengthen your employer brand? Do not forget the objectives for participating employees. What can they get out of their ambassadorship? Think, for example, of strengthening their authority position. Only in this way do you encourage employees to voluntarily share content. You do not want to oblige them."

Define the DNA of your organization
Companies that want to do labor market communications in the United States, need a strong emphasis on communicating their core values. Peter Stanton of Stanton Communications in the United States recognizes four core values ​​that are frequently present at the moment: respect, freedom, opportunities and transparency. These values ​​are characterized by offering flexible working hours, having a good work-life balance and realizing career growth. Stanton explains: "Especially in the context of #metoo, respect is a very important core value. All employees must be treated equally. In this sense, the core value of freedom is the opportunity to give your opinion as an employee and to be able to express yourself without any negative consequences. By contributing these four core values ​​internally and externally, employees can transfer a good image of the organization to their own network. It is their challenge to give it their own twist!"

Authenticity as a guideline

After all, individuality is vitally important for the success of employee advocacy. You want to stand out, not using empty phrases and boring generalities. Meike Grisson from the German Panama PR talks about how they are tackling this: "Certainly in Germany it is noticeable that employees are eager to work on their thought leadership position. When they do not have a clear idea of ​​content that is worth sharing, you can help employees and provide them with authentic content. There is already a lot of handy technology for this, such as LinkedIn Elevate, Bambu or DrumUp. Make sure that it is not pre-fabricated news. "

Grisson also explains that in Germany, they pay a lot of attention to best practices, such as the story of a new employee who enthusiastically discusses his training and how he already uses the learnings of this in his daily work. By choosing someone to which new candidates can mirror themselves, you show that you recognize the wishes of job-seekers and actually acknowledge them.

Show your workplace

In addition to the company's own channels and employees, external channels can maximize results. For example, in France external online platforms are often used, says Catherine Kablé of Kablé Communication: "In France, a lot of use is made of the job board Welcome to the Jungle. Here employers can be put in the spotlight through attractive content. Photos of the office, videos with the daily activities, what the male – female ratio is: you can find all sorts of information. This content brings the organizational culture to life, shows the core values ​​and is therefore very effective for attracting new talent. Employees can also add content to the company profile themselves. In addition, links can be placed to the social channels of the organization."

And the viewpoint from Feintuch Communications? 

"In the U.S., where thousands of PR firms of all sizes compete – and new physical and virtual organizations join the competition each month – it’s critical to communicate who and what your organization stands for on an ongoing basis. It’s also about listening and understanding the wants and needs of the talent pool," states Henry Feintuch, president, Feintuch Communications.

"Today’s millennials, for example, want far more than just a steady job; they want to learn, be able to experiment (and fail) and be given responsibility. Salary, benefits and job title alone will not attract and retain these professionals. It’s about job satisfaction and work/life balance. With the competition for talent so keen, employers must communicate their respect for employees, the opportunities for growth and ability to enjoy their work."
Eline Visser has another tip for extra involvement: "In order to motivate your employees, it is effective to show them their contribution. How much coverage did his or her blog, vlog or article get and how much engagement has been achieved? If you really want to bring it, you can set up an internal competition across the entire width of the organization, which will keep track of which employee generates the most interaction with his or her messages. That way you make it fun and make your results visible to everyone. Your ambassadors program will spread quickly!"

Real and sincere
Whether you want to deploy employee advocacy in Europe or in the United States, one thing is obvious. Organizations need to show their personality more than ever through their employees. What is stronger than having your own employees talk about what your company really stands for and what it is all about? For example, content distributed by employees on social channels reaches no less than 561 percent more persons than messages distributed through their own company channels[1]. By drawing up core values ​​and communicating them clearly to your employees, they can identify themselves better with the organization and communicate these values ​​externally. Then you can look at a good advocacy strategy that brings your company to the attention of new talents. The right strategy not only helps your employees to acquire a stronger thought leadership position, but at the same time it is also cheaper than purchasing social media ads. By offering authentic content and giving employees insight into the results they achieve, they remain motivated to share their expertise with their network. New employees, come on in!

In part two of this series we will discuss fake news. What does this mean for the PR world and how do international PR agencies deal with this? Should they take more responsibility, or leave this up to journalists? Stay tuned.

[1]  According to PostBeyond, 2018

Monday, August 20, 2018

What are the Similarities Between Journalism and PR?

Last July, after being a television news producer for over three years, I left the journalism industry to pursue a new career path in public relations.  Many former journalists (including our very own Henry Feintuch) have successfully made the switch to the new, yet related field of public relations.  I knew that I would face some challenges in the transition, but I also knew that there was a strong relationship between both professions and I was excited to translate the skills I’d developed as a producer to my new career as a PR professional.

There are probably more similarities than there are differences between journalism and public relations but here are, in my humble opinion, the top five similarities:

1.       No two days are the same
Much like in a newsroom, where your work is determined by the news of the day, no two days are alike as a PR professional.  What I find exciting about PR is the variety of work from day to day.  We represent many different clients, with many different needs and objectives that require different approaches and strategies.  Whether you’re a journalist or a PR professional, your days are busy and full and there’s always something new to tackle each day.
2.       Clear and concise writing reigns supreme
In both professions, efficient and timely communication is the key to success. Journalists and PR professionals keep their intended audience in mind when writing and try to relay information that’s both engaging and easy to understand.  Whether it’s writing a press release or a feature story, to grab the audience’s attention and keep them engaged, the writing and the message must be clear and concise.
3.       It’s all about the story
Both journalists and PR professionals are in constant communication with the public.  Yes, there is more strategy involved on the PR side of things, but ultimately, it’s all about telling your clients’ story.  I’ve had to put on my “journalist thinking cap” to interview some of our own clients to gain a new perspective or a new angle that could then be turned into a pitch, by-lined article or press release.  Journalists know there’s always a story waiting to come out if you’re willing to look for it.
4.       Trust and credibility are imperative
To be successful in both journalism and PR, it’s crucial to develop credible and meaningful relationships.  PR professionals need to build relationships with reporters in order to get coverage for their client and reporters must have credibility with the public in order for their story to gain an audience.  Both journalists and PR professionals build these relationships through relaying honest and credible information.
5.       Using your “news sense”
Journalists are constantly asking themselves, “will people care about my story and if not, how do I shape it so that they do?”  PR professionals, on the other hand, are asking themselves a very similar question when shaping press releases: “will a journalist buy this and if not, how do I make them interested?” At the end of the day, the goal is to use your “news sense” to determine how to best shape a story for your intended audience.

I’ve been an account executive for nine months now and I still learn something new every day.  When I look back on my short tenure in public relations, I’m thankful for my time as a news producer and the invaluable perspective it’s given me as I continue to grow and learn as a PR professional.  In my next post, I’ll cover the major differences between journalism and public relations.  Until then, thank you for reading and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!

Monday, August 6, 2018

Small Talk is Big for PR Pros

I remember how my professors at Syracuse University would bristle when they heard a student say the reason they selected PR for a career was because “I like people.” They were offended at the implication that PR is merely about shaking hands, smiling, slapping backs, etc., rather than a serious practice within the communications field.
That said, liking and taking interest in people is not a bad thing for the PR professional. After all, the cornerstone of what we do revolves around creating and maintaining relationships. While these are mostly professional interactions, the personal side of the equation should not be overlooked.
We’re all aware that just about any meeting we participate in will start or end with small talk. It could be a discussion of the weather, weekend plans or a shared interest. This banter is a natural warm up and cool down to the business at hand and makes the work day a little more pleasant. However, it can represent more—an opportunity to learn more about your clients and co-workers. Do they have kids or play a musical instrument? Are they health nuts, foodies or travelers? These casual chats can forge important connections that will likely serve you well over the course of your career.
For example, I have a colleague that is a hardcore biker. We worked with a client that was also a biking fanatic, and the two of them would have intense exchanges that would cover all manner of bike equipment and the ungodly numbers of miles they each biked the previous weekend and for the year-to-date. While I never felt as out of shape in my life as when I listened to these discussions, I could appreciate the friendly connection between the two of them. This client has moved on, but they remain friendly and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were to find occasion to work together again.
Personally, I look forward to being one of the first on the line for the conference call to chat up the client before we all roll up our sleeves to pay the bills. However, small talk comes more naturally to some than others. Case in point: I have a friend in the business who used to drive to client meetings with his boss. On the way, he’d be asked about his family – where did he grow up, where did he live now, did he have any brothers or sisters, etc. This is nice, right? The problem was that over the course of 10 to 12 of these trips – he’d be asked THE SAME QUESTIONS EVERY TIME! It was clear his boss was going through the motions and didn’t really care to know anything about him. Not a great way to forge a connection. (While this disingenuousness would seem an unfavorable trait for a PR professional, it occurs to me that this person is one of the most successful PR people I know of. So what the hell do I know?)
Regardless, I’m going to stick with my premise that PR is a “people” business and that it is worthwhile to make the effort to get to know those with whom you associate. More often than not, you’ll find it will add enjoyment to the job and may even lead to your professional enrichment and advancement.

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Public Relations: The Next 50 Years

Recently, the editorial team at O'Dwyer's approached a group of PR industry veterans and asked them to contribute articles, tributes and comments regarding the approaching 50th anniversary of the PR industry publication family.

Though the years are ticking by, I surely didn't have first-hand insight into the O'Dwyer Newsletter's
first decades. But I have been in the journalism industry (briefly) and PR for nearly 35 years. That's long enough to have watched the profession -- and the O'Dwyer editorial franchise -- change and expand.

In my guest article, featured in the O'Dwyer's July 2018 50th Anniversary Magazine,  I wrote about my personal interactions with publisher and editor Jack O'Dwyer. The article went on to look at changes over the past 50 years in public relations, and then, through the thoughts of some industry experts and friends, it took a look at what the next 50 years might bring.

The Feintuch team welcomes your reaction to those forecasts and opens the pages of our blog to your own thoughts and forecasts -- script a paragraph or a column and send it over.

Let's all meet up in another 50 years and see how we did!

Monday, September 25, 2017

Trade Show Reflections En Route to - of Course - a Trade Show

It’s a Saturday afternoon and if it were my regular weekend routine, I would have worked out with my trainer at the gym, paid some bills, gone shopping with my wife and would be making plans for dinner out.

But instead, I’m 39,000+ feet above the Rockies headed to Los Angeles for a major e-commerce trade show called, sponsored by the National Retail Federation

Our client, Klarna, is an online payments company that provides innovative ways for merchants to make the online checkout experience “frictionless” and “smoooth.”  They’re a big deal globally – the financial community calls Klarna a unicorn due to its private valuation in excess of $2b.

At the show, Klarna will have a booth (where I’ll be living during show hours), is a sponsor and will be speaking on the show stage with one of its client partners. Our team will put out a press release for Klarna Tuesday morning and I’ll be handling media relations for Klarna’s North American CEO and the company’s featured client. Over the course of the next few days, there will be informal company meetings to attend, press materials to print and assemble, participation in an industry party on Monday night, long booth hours, visits to the press room, press interviews, industry analyst meetings, planning and more.

I’ve been doing this for more than 30 years and know what? It hasn't grown stale. It’s every bit as exciting as my first trade show, though perhaps a bit less scary.

I remember my first trade show, in Miami, when I was a younger pup working for a small PR department in an ad agency called Paul Kaufman Associates. I was the lead account executive for a company called Periphonics, a mainframe computer, voice response technology company (and small subsidiary of Gilbarco, which in turn was an Exxon portfolio company) that was pushing its way into the banking industry. It was Periphonics’s vision and plan to support a then new concept called banking by phone. They would do that by making it easy for consumers and business people to call their bank’s computer, and by pushing touch tone buttons, find out their balance and complete simple banking transactions.

Similar to what I did last night, I packed for my trip, clutched my press kits close to me to ensure they would be with me in Florida and headed off to the American Banking Association’s National Operations and Automation Conference. The "big time" for a kid growing up in Coney Island!
But concerns overtook me: Would I embarrass my agency in some way? Would the media show up for their scheduled interviews? Would my client take me seriously? Would I fit in with its booth staff?

The show and my efforts turned out well. We handled many trade media interviews and I politely nagged all Miami-area reporters including the local AP correspondent. And surprise, AP ran an item and it was picked up by the New York Times. I returned to New York standing a little bit taller – a conquering business war hero and a little bit more experienced in the ways of PR.

Between then and now, I’ve attended several hundred trade shows in banking and financial services, consumer electronics, AV, oil and gas, food products, dairy products, packaging, paper and plastics, insurance, photography, e-commerce, aviation, mining, advertising, public relations, ergonomics, electrical and electronics and more. Trade shows provide the opportunity for PR practitioners to learn more about their clients, their clients’ industries and emerging issues; meet the media in person; interact with customers and prospects; and for a while, immerse into another world.

It never grows stale! Wonder what I’ll learn this week…